US healthcare company behind academic meeting
Per Aspenberg, professor of orthopaedics, thought he was invited to an academic meeting with the world’s most prominent osteoporosis researchers. After arriving at the luxury hotel in Geneva, he found out that an American company was behind it all.
“My impression was that everyone at the meeting made an effort to deliver good news regarding the company, AgNovos Healthcare and their product,” says Professor Aspenberg, who has published a feature article in the British Medical Journal entitled How I was nearly duped into “authoring” a fake paper.
How did you react when you were invited to this exclusive meeting?
I was happy and flattered, but became puzzled when I heard I was supposed to speak about “currently available orthopaedic procedures for bone enhancement”. Because no such procedures exist. But one week before the meeting I received an email from a “medical writer”, attaching a synopsis where I said that a certain type of treatment was ”gaining momentum”.
What sort of treatment were you supposed to recommend?
A method where you inject bone cement into the thigh bone to make it stronger. The only scientific study I could find on this had been conducted on cadavers. The idea is that the cement will break down after a few years and be replaced by new bone – quite an absurd idea.
In any case, you attended the meeting at a five-star hotel in Geneva. What happened?
There were nine participants, but in addition three representatives from AgNovos Healthcare appeared. I said that my presentation could be cancelled, as there is no evidence for any prophylactic methods. But I gave my presentation; for 45 minutes I explained why prophylactic surgery is unrealistic. I was the only speaker with any sort of surgical background. Then one of the hosts of the meeting – a world-leading osteoporisis researcher – presented AgNovos’ product and how it could be developed. Finally the company got advice from the researchers on how the idea could be marketed. After four hours, including lunch and two coffee breaks, the meeting ended.
How was the meeting documented?
The ghost writer was going to write a “scientific” article, with all of us as authors. One of the organisers of the meeting is editor for an influential osteoporosis journal, where the article was to be published. In mid July the draft of the article arrived. “Prophylactic surgery”, in particular AgNovos’ method, was described as promising. My points, for instance that the risks were likely greater than the benefits, were not included. The article was false. I asked to be removed from the author list, and this request was granted.
What consequences could this have for your future research?
The meeting co-chairs are very influential people with huge networks, so I might have difficulty getting my articles published. But the risk would have been greater if I had been an osteoporosis researcher, rather than an orthopaedist.
What is the worst thing about this story?
What upsets me most is the attitudes in these cliques; they live in a bubble and have lost touch with research ethics. Concrete evidence of this is this “academic” meeting that results in a draft where the conclusions have been pre-written in collaboration with a corporate actor.
Illustration: Per Aspenberg
Text: Åke Hjelm
Photo: Göran Billeson, Geneva Imagine
LiU researchers have joined international calls for a boycott of scientific conferences in the US.
Psychology students took on role of treaters in a study of perfectionism and internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy.
Social value creation is on the agendas of more and more companies and organisations. Erik Jannesson, senior lecturer in management control, has just published a book on the subject.
Rolf Holmqvist is one of 17 researchers who are critical to guidelines for the treatment of depression and anxiety.
Malin Thor Tureby was keynote speaker at an international conference on oral history.
Cats that meow with a dialect have caused a sensation in the world media. Robert Eklund, a linguist who works with cats at the Department of Culture and Communication, has lost count of the number of times the work has been reported in the media.
On 6 December, a Farewell Mingle was held for departing exchange students who have studied at Linköping University.
"We have a global and critical perspective that attracts today's students," says Stefan Jonsson, professor at REMESO, about the Faculty of Arts and Science’s first international master’s programme at REMESO in Norrköping - Ethnic and Migration Studies.
Achieving perfect health has become a religion in the western world, according to a newly published study. Barbro Wijma, professor emerita and physician with many years of experience meeting patients, views this development with dismay.
Skin colour matters, also in Sweden. But many people don’t accept that racism is a problem here – only in other countries. So claims doctoral student Victoria Kawesa, who writes about black feminism and whiteness in Sweden.
Johanna Sköld from Child Studies at Linköping University co-organised an international workshop where researchers compared various models of compensation for institutional neglect and abuse.
Anna Lindström and Monika Lopez of the Department of Culture and Communication applied earlier this year for funding for an initiative in an issue relating to refugees. The funding was granted, and the “Tomorrow’s Nobel laureates” project was born.
Suad Ali, expert on Sweden’s refugee quota, works tirelessly for refugees worldwide. For her dedication she has been chosen as one of Linköping University’s two Alumni of the Year.
Thomas Lunner’s research has given improved hearing to millions of people with impaired hearing. He has been chosen as one of this year’s Alumni of the Year.
Last updated: 2017-02-13